devop:f2fs
                Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| devop:f2fs [2025/10/30] – created hayati | devop:f2fs [Unknown date] (current) – external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ~~NOTRANS~~ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Flash Friendly File System (F2FS) ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | For Pis like Raspberry-Pi, | ||
| + | |||
| + | But, in general, an F2FS formatted micro-SD with an USB-adapter is to be preferred over USB-memory-sticks: | ||
| + | i couldn' | ||
| + | |||
| + | The difference was/is observable with [[fmlist_scanner: | ||
| + | the scanner writes the scan results of a few kiloBytes approximately every 4 to 6 minutes.\\ | ||
| + | USB-memory sticks showed defects every few months.\\ | ||
| + | A friend is now running the same SD-card with F2FS for over 2 years. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Here, links to some articles: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Changing the Raspberry Pi image filesystem to F2FS | ||
| + |     * https:// | ||
| + | * [HOWTO] F2FS | ||
| + |     * https:// | ||
| + | * Optimizing SD cards longevity | ||
| + |     * https:// | ||
| + | * microSD Endurance (TBW) and Monitoring | ||
| + |     * https:// | ||
| + | * SD card corruption after one year with daily hard resets | ||
| + |     * https:// | ||
| + | * cvt2f2fs | ||
| + |     * https:// | ||
| + | |||
